We are not addressing the root problem," said the same resident.These are aproximations of how long it takes to attract a dweller. "I actually think it's trashy for us to be investing in these band-aid solutions on this gaping wound of homelessness. The public speaker said a more permanent solution is needed and not a temporary one. Mayor Watson, I heard you recently speak that you are committed to solving homelessness, but I'm concerned that what your focus seems to be is more on cleaning it up," said one resident during public comment. It's the ‘keep Austin pretty’ initiative. It's just meant to get people out of the eyes. "I'm going to call the marshaling yard what I feel it is. They said it seemed like a rushed project that would not help the homeless issue at all. Many were against the idea of creating an emergency homeless shelter in a city-owned facility for a year. You just can Google that," said one resident against item 126.Īnother hot button issue was agenda item 111. "I get it, but if you look it up, and you Google a row home in the Mueller, it's $700,000. Other residents could not agree with that statement. "There are not enough townhomes, cottage homes, and condos for those who are just starting out, and these are often beautiful buildings," said an Austinite in support of item 126. Supporters of the item said townhomes, rowhomes, triplexes and four-plexes will be affordable options. "We should not have to choose between staying in the city and having a family," said an Austin resident. However, many supported the item and said everyone should have the chance to live in Austin.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |